I’d like to wish all of you an endearing Valentine’s Day, in any way you might wish to celebrate the holiday. In these times, Valentine’s Day is generally accepted as a vow of love between two people, though its history is steeped in mystery and variations of origin. Most early references are associated with events of martyrdom and the courage to follow moral convictions of the heart; this embodies and sustains goodness, and what is right. That’s love.
Donald Isle Foster and Jan Thomson, Seattle, ca. 1999, photograph by Terry Arnett
When I first met Don Foster in 1972, he’d recently purchased the Richard White Gallery in Seattle’s Pioneer Square from Dick White. Very soon thereafter, I met Jan Thomson, who worked week-ends at the Gallery. Both, in their own various ways, became legendary in the structural rhythm of Pacific Northwest Arts. My first exhibition at Foster/White was in the autumn of 1973. Though Seattle is quite different today than it was then, many of my fellow artists exhibiting at the gallery and legions of new ones remain vibrant contributors to the vital spirit of Northwest Arts.
On This Day, Valentine’s Day, in the rich exhuberance of red hearts and love, women, entwining elephants, captivating birds, and the boy in the boat, I do so honor my friend and mentor, the late Lennie kesl.
UPCOMING and UPDATES
In the next issue of ‘The Journal,’ news about the Elephant Heart Project. Stay tuned! Coming soon!
Galen’s unabridged definition for ELEPHANT HEART: Igniting creative expressions through poetry, prose, and visual imagery, nurturing the critical synchronicity of life and life’s habitat, our home, planet Earth—a communion of sacred reciprocity.
painting of elephants by Thai students from the school of hearing imparied, Chiangmai, 2002
Also, Chang Lek and I are pleased to announce the upcoming Elephants and Art Winter Tour in Northern Thailand. Be sure and check the March issue.
For an update on STRAIT ART, Jake Seniuk’s remarkable book published by Marrowstone Press.
Coming in April: a featured interview with the remarkable American artist
Oylosedentos, Galen Garwood, galenograph, 2020
SOMEDAY, for kados
There is, of course, the hue, I said
and of the hue,
should it be warm? Red?
It is blood, he cautioned,
sun and earth.
But you’ll also need
what is cool—green to blue to black,
like strata of the sea.
We were standing near the edge of a spent field
of grain that fell to the sun and a raking mistral.
I brought only questions, I said, as he turned to his work
with a stony silence, chewing on the stem of cold, blue pipe,
facing the wind, the fierce slapping of canvas, waiting
for imagination’s raw nerve to let go a vision.
There is intensity, I said, and purity.
How deep the shade? How bright?
how much white? Should I
consider the opacity
and the amount of light let through?
Should it recede or dominate?
Remember, he said, within the color there is the passage.
You might expect it to end all at once,
but it doesn’t. It often wants to modulate
from cold to hot,
hot to cold.
Yes, but will the hue be held by line? And the line,
will it be long or short? Thick or thin? How it should be broken?
Or should it? Should it be continuous, holding
Should it be dark or light? What value
and should it shift?
Check for sincerity, he barked.
Lines can lie. Remember
there are timid ones, as well,
with low, slow curves that drift
unattached. Consider this: every line
has a beginning and an end.
Where does it start? Where
and far will you take it?
It might only be implied.
What about chiaroscuro?
Should it be rendered a paraclete of lost beauty,
a palimpsest, perhaps?
Consider this, he said,
it’s true; beneath the surface lies
another surface. But how many
must you uncover to find what you need?
I haven’t yet thought that far, I said,
but what about shape?
And size? One large with many small?
Amorphous? Perhaps it would be nice
to have them all angular,
sharply defined. The shapes
will have to get to know each.
Will they fight or make love?
He turned back into the wind. I could tell
by the movement of his ears he was smiling.
What about surface? I asked.
Texture. Should it be real or trompe l’oeil?
Should it dance with a scumble
or a stipple? How clear should it be? How muddy?
What of the sheen? Should light slide across
in a very slick fashion?
He bent to the earth
and scooped up a handful of dirt.
I suppose matte would do, he said, scrubbing out
an unwanted passage.
He turned to me, away from the wind.
Everything often dies on the borders, he said.
That’s where you find the mood.
Do you want it cosmic and reverential?
A mysterious essence moving into the center of things?
Something absurdly abstract? Or a political,
social implication, scratched then smeared in blood-red?
A blind gesture?
What about a simple landscape, I said, or a Chinese vase
filled with peonies?
There is always the portrait. Always that.
I remember well Dr. Gachet’s, his face filled
with what seemed wistful regret
beneath that ocher hat, his hands
painted a delicate flesh tint, a blue frock coat,
the yellow books on a red table,
the foxglove plant with purple flowers.
He looked up just as a crescendo of wind-
scattered clouds and a rabble of crows
sped across the burning fields, a flash of black
against the gold, against the blue and white sky.
Someday, he said, pointing at the billowing canvas,
someone will look at this
and find themselves amazed to know they were here
in this stand of ragged wheat,
with all these hungry birds diving into the shadows. You
with all your questions and me leaning into the wind.
This is where they’ll find us, in this painting;
this is where we’ve always been.